Are Electric Cars the Clean, Green, Smart Future?

Some Owners Are Green Imagineers Convinced That “They Are Saving the Planet”

by Tracy Turner              

re Electric Cars Worth It Better Expensive Greenwashing Pros Cons Powered By Coal

After decades of activism, the Navajo coal plant has been demolished. It would be remiss not to ackowledge that the grid, at molasses speed, is slowly getting greener - just don't look at the Rare Earth's carcinogenic mining sludge from Wind Turbine Neodymium Generator Magnets and 'Smart' 'Electric' Cars... Someone, anyone, please tell Al Gore that Neodymium mining (tailings sludge) is not "clean" and is the antithesis of "sustainable."

 

Al Gore is asking Americans to dump their conventional autos and "buy electric" at the beginning of a continent-wide mega drought (a period devoid of hydroelectric power). Why would Al Gore preach about EVs when roughly one-third of America has a shortage of hydroelectricity? This combination of megadrought and dry damswill simply raise the price of kilowatts, which will then stick at the higher pricing. Consumers of EVs follow the brainwash marketing trend and are oblivious of the deficit of rainfall and how it directly relates to hydroelectricity production. The less water in reservoirs, the more Coal is burned to make up the shortfall and to power "clean, smart" cars. At least 23% of all electricity in the US is from Coal (Mountaintop Mining for 'squeaky-clean' EVs). 


New and used car salesmen, everywhere, worldwide, lie – but probably nowhere do they prevaricate more than they do in the U.S.A. You are saving the Planet, look, no tailpipe, no pollution! Look, it even says Zero Emissions above the back bumper! But what happens when you follow the Electrical Cord all the way back to its source? Those already invested in Tesla’s, Nissan Leaf’s, et al will never admit that their vehicle (in the U.S.) is 60% Fossil, 20% Nuclear. To be more concise, according to eia.gov, “In 2021, about 61% of U.S. utility-scale electricity generation was produced from fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, and petroleum), about 19% was from nuclear energy, and about 20% was from renewable energy sources.” So, by extrapolation, 81% of your vehicle emissions, spewed out in someone else’s backyard (the coal plants are frequently blowing downwind into Ethnic Ghettos and Indian Reservations).

 

In an honest country in an honest world, the little brainwashing “Zero Emissions” plastic-chrome emblem on the trunk lid would be removed as blatant, brainwash false advertising.

 

Other Brainwashing vehicles include:

 

·  2022 Audi E-Tron GT…

·  2022 BMW i4. ...

·  2022 Chevrolet Bolt EV. ...

·  2022 Lucid Air Dream Edition. ...

·  2022 Mercedes-EQ EQS. ...

·  2022 Mini Cooper SE. ...

·  2022 Nissan Leaf. ...

·  2022 Pininfarina Battista

 

Unlike Motor Trend, let’s look at where they put the tailpipes on these fine stewards of Mother Earth.

 

The Top 10 Polluters are all primarily coal-fired power plants.

 


The Largest Coal Power Stations In The United States

 

1.    Robert W Scherer Power Plant. Robert W Scherer Power Plant is located in Juliette, Georgia. ...

2.    Gibson Generating Station. ...

3.    Monroe Power Plant. ...

4.    Bowen Power Station.

     

For a full accounting of Coal-burning plants powering “no-tail-pipe cars,” click here.

Let’s talk about Zero a moment. Zero = 0, Zero ≠ “Zero.” Also, the Lakes of Radium, Uranium, Lead and Cadmium sludge in the Rare Earth Mines (where “Electric” Motor Neodymium magnets – these mining tailing ponds and sludge dump sites are not Zero, they are deadly cesspools of carcinogens. Al Gore should be horse-whipped for spreading the fallacy that electric cars are “clean” or “zero” emitting. "Electric Cars" are 61% filthy Fossil Fuels, 19% filthy Nuclear.

61% of electrical generation is Fossil Fuels, 19% is nuclear. All of that fossil is greenhouse gases and PAH, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (cancer, emphysema, COPD). The only thing clean is the brainwashing in the driver’s cranium, the false-belief in “no-tailpipe.” The tailpipe is just big and far away.

Now for the bad news about electric cars… They are 19% nuclear, the fuel could accidentally melt (like Chernobyl and Fukushima) and make a 4.5 billion year mess. The “spent” fuel rods (they are not really spent, they are radioactive and hot as all hell and will be unable to be handled by humans or robots, well, for billions and billions of years. Nobody has ever devised of a way to deal with nuclear waste, it just gets off-put and off-put, again and again as there is no solution to this vile, atomic filth. Most of it, chemically speaking, one molecule is enough to kill you or threaten your life. …Oh, and 19% of your “electric” car runs on Nuclear Filth. This is the new direction Guru’s like Al Gore and Taylor Swift have steered us into. So if you bought-in, hook, line and sinker, 61% of your car is Fossil Greenhouse PAH filth and 19% of your car is 4.6 billion year atomic filth that may melt and cause a few hundred thousand people or more to die of cancer. You look so good in the drivers seat of your new EV, here, let me take your picture - while dozens, hundreds of people on the other end of your cord die of COPD and/or Emphysema.


My cars tailpipe, not in my backyard, in your backyard, out-of-mind


My favorite title is Race, Pollution and the Mastery of Nature. Everybody builds the tailpipes of the uber-elite, the “bitchin’” people, just upwind from somebody else’s ghetto, because the poor are too poor to sue and win. One person gets to cruise Hollywood Blvd. in a new Tesla, another person inhales coal soot, ash, PAH and Mercury 24/7/365. Al Gore knows this, and Al Gore is corrupt. If Taylor Swift and Al Gore grounded their Jets 24/7/365 for life, millions of tons of the Ice Sheets at both poles would stop melting. If they stopped playing lying car salesmen, millions of people would stop getting dosed with Power Plant PAH. One can only wonder if Gore is getting a paycheck from Big Nuke and another from ConEdison? When everyone has an electric car and gas is no more, we will literally drown in Nuclear Waste, Rare Earths Mining Sludge/Tailings Ponds and Fossil PAH. Shame on our lying, deceiving politicians! Buy this car, it has **NO TAILPIPE**


Are Electric Cars Worth It Better Expensive Greenwashing Pros Cons Powered By Coal

Countries burning Coal (18th-19th Century "Technology" aka (Oxymoron) "Smart Cars" burning coal. Countries with the Highest Total Coal Consumption in the World (million cubic feet) burned annually: China — 4,320 trillion MMcf. India — 966 trillion MMcf. United States — 731 trillion MMcf. Germany — 257 trillion MMcf. Russia — 230 trillion MMcf. Japan — 210 trillion MMcf. South Africa — 202 trillion MMcf. South Korea — 157 trillion MMcf. The Coal burning is to power "Smart" vehicles.

To say that the United States has an aging electric transmission infrastructure is a sizable understatement. The average age of the installed base is forty years old, with more than a quarter of the grid fifty years old or older. How much would it cost to modernize the power grid? Sixty percent of U.S. distribution lines have surpassed their 50-year life expectancy, according to Black and Veatch, while the Brattle Group estimates that $1.5 trillion to $2 trillion will be spent by 2030 to modernize the grid just to maintain reliability. The cost to make the grid "worthy" of millions more EVs will likely be higher taxes, higher utility bills and cuts in other services -- all for Coal, Petroleul (Fuel Oil) and Nuclear Powered Cars (18th - 20th Century "Tech").  


From Mike Davis, Ecology of Fear:

 

"In her study of tree rings in foxtail pines and western junipers along the eastern flank of the Sierra, Graumlich discovered evidence of two catastrophic droughts, lasting 220-years and 140-years respectively."

 

From Los Angeles Times:

 

By FRANK CLIFFORD

June 16, 1994 12 AM PT

TIMES ENVIRONMENTAL WRITER

 

A study of the stumps of ancient trees that once grew from stream beds and lake bottoms in the Sierra Nevada has turned up new evidence that droughts in California can last 100 years or more, far longer than the state’s official estimates.

 

In this week’s issue of the British journal Nature, a Cal State Hayward professor writes that submerged stumps in Mono Lake, Tenaya Lake in Yosemite National Park, the West Walker River in the northern Sierra and Osgood Swamp near Lake Tahoe are relics of trees that grew on land that was uncovered when droughts reduced water levels by up to 60 feet.

 

The cottonwoods and Jeffrey pines drowned when the drought ended and high water returned, according to Scott Stine, a professor of physical geology. He attributes the droughts to extended periods of naturally caused global warming which, if they recurred, could have disastrous effects.

 

“The message for California is that we are subject to droughts far more severe and persistent than we have ever realized,” Stine said in an interview this week. “While we can’t predict when such droughts will occur, we would be fools to think that they won’t.

 

If they recur, Stine said, “the current urban and agricultural infrastructure could not be maintained. It would bring California to its knees.”


 

are electric cars the future

 

why are electric cars better

 

why electric cars are bad

 

are electric cars more expensive

 

are electric cars greenwashing

 

are electric cars good for the environment pros and cons

 

are electric cars powered by coal

 

are electric cars better than gas cars

 

Are Electric Cars Worth It Better Expensive Greenwashing Pros Cons Powered By Coal?