Obama’s Clean, Green Fukushima Plumegate Machine
originally April 21, 2011, updated October 22, 2024
German Protestors Stand Unhappily Beside a Nuclear Train, in Infrared. This article posted, then removed from Activist Post. They have refused all submissions since this one.
Tracy
Turner
What do Ann Coulter and Barack Obama have in common? Pay
attention to the following video link where Ann Coulter uses the phrase, “the minimum
amount of radiation, * you
should be exposed to *.” Ann Coulter’s assertion that nuclear radiation is
like a health suntan is insane. Here is what Japan now looks like, atomically speaking. The Obama
administration Fukushima cover-up is known as Plumegate
cover-up (primarily leaked on The Intel Hub).
Ann Coulter’s not-so-subtle slip of the tongue, as if
implied one has a minimum daily dose needed for radiation, as one does for
Vitamin C. The West Coast of the US received Radioactive Iodine Fukushima, but the government forgot to
mention radioactive Strontium 90 and Cesium 137. Any dosage of radiation is a
cumulative cancer antagonist. Who do you trust more, Ann Coulter or Helen Caldicott? Do you trust Barack
Obama with the nuke industry or Dr. Doug Rokke;
Monsanto Lawyer Hillary Clinton or Nuclear Expert/Physician Dr. Helen
Caldicott? Helen Caldicott has actually treated radiation victims.
Mining is just the first step, and then there is Uranium
milling, more carbon from conventional power plants, and one more filthy, toxic
nuclear HAZMAT site in need of decontamination. Nuke industry apologists use
words like clean, safe and cheap,
ignoring dirty, killer or Wake Up and When
the Dust Settles by David Bradbury.
The USA is storing 57,634 Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride
Casks containing 28,000 pounds of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride each —
1,613,752,000 pounds of highly lethal atomic waste. Where’s the clean? This photo
link is only a portion of America’s nuclear waste; is it what Billo and Ann Coulter imply that the government is
depriving us of our “healthy share quota,” as if it is a vitamin, rather
than a carcinogen? Obama, Billo and Coulter are all
pro-nuke industry — who was paid and/or promised what?
“President Obama’s fiscal
year 2012 budget outlines a plan for reviving the country’s nuclear power
industry, calling for $36 billion in government-backed loan guarantees for new
nuclear reactors and setting aside more than $800 million for nuclear energy
research”. Plumegate had and has motive.
The New York Times, which is only a stone’s throw
physically from Wall Street, regularly publishes pieces such as this: Pro-Big-Nuke letter. The New York
Times will headline articles with pro-nuke jargon such as, “Despite
Protests, Waste Arrives in Germany – The New York Times”. Not a whisper about
February 19, 2013 rain and snow in California, 506% more radioactive than
background. Expect Google, Yahoo! and Bing to blacklist web pages about nuclear
rain in California. Expect many so-called alt-news sites to censor 506% more
radioactive than background rain. California nuclear-contaminated milk, corn or
beef, anyone?
6 videos: “clean, safe, abundant” nuclear waste / 4.6
billion-year half-life atomic poison:
https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/how-nuclear-apologists-mislead-the-world-over-radiation
Dozens of demonstrators gather in Paris to protest against
France’s nuclear energy policies:
https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/how-nuclear-apologists-mislead-the-world-over-radiation
Anti-nuclear protesters took to the streets in Germany,
France and Belgium to mark the one-year anniversary of Japan’s Fukushima
nuclear disaster. Protester Veoh:
France, Post Fukushima
USA nuclear spent fuel dry cask (probably containing spent
fuel):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y93riMwoa6M
.
Concrete dry casks (empty in this case) for nuclear spent
fuel:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBaEXiQajw8
.
This train video contains two DODX (Dept of Defense) nuclear
casks being moved: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TPod_0l7bY
.
Imagine this US train derailing near your home:
Go to time frame 2:30, four Uranium dry casks filled with
reactor ‘spent’ rods, spent meaning hotter and more dangerously radioactive
than ‘fresh’ fuel rods. The oxymoron of clean nuclear is waste: mining and
milling Superfund sites, trainloads of waste, reactor pools and dry concrete
casks of 4.6 billion year waste – essentially forever poison.
Do you live within a kill zone of derailed nuclear waste or
a reactor meltdown? A nuclear train derailment will give new meaning to the
misnomer “clean nuclear”. The nuclear power plants are aging past their
intended life spans; “new” nuke plants are not a new car that can be replaced
every two years; obsolescence is part of the design. Nuke plants, by their very
nature, outlive their newness and operate in a long period of obsolescence,
cracked pipes, leaks, etc.
The government guarantees loans that banks would not touch
with a 20-ft-pole, contractors build a facility that is generally flawed with
both design and contraction flaws. Massive amounts of fuel and electricity are
consumed to build fuel assemblies that will not cool off and become non-toxic
for billions upon billions of years. What are Obama’s grandchildren and great,
great grandchildren going to do with nuke waste that is worse than useless — a
silent killer than lasts for eternity. Free market capitalism, replete with
taxpayer sponsorship and deadly eternal waste.
The apologists always use the same buzzwords: safe, clean, abundant, affordable
nuke. They always ignore the same issues: ultra-deadly, outlasts the scale
of hundreds of generations, small amount of energy produced, super abundant
amounts of scorched earth and undisposable waste,
accident prone and unforeseeable exigent circumstances nuke.
Perhaps Ann Coulter and Barack Obama need to have lunch and
read the Greenpeace report on Chernobyl
Cancers/Deaths. American news often refuses to use terms like the UK
Guardian’s term, “triple meltdown”.
American media has been largely apologist, with emphasis on radioactive Iodine
(which dissipates rapidly) and little emphasis on any or all of the following:
US, Japanese and worldwide nuclear plants venting radioactive Tritium, lung
cancers in American and Australian Uranium miners, cancers of many of those who handled
Depleted Uranium “penetrator” weapons (including the victims overseas and NATO
troops), Uranium, Plutonium, Cesium and Strontium isotopes. The entire list is
dismissed with an intended lie, the oxymoron misnomer “natural background”.
Long-term health issues
from Cesium 137 and Strontium 90 levels in Japan, in the Pacific Ocean and
in the US West Coast are going to kill for essentially infinite generations.
Such issues are relegated to apologist terms such as “natural background”
radiation.
(Audio, links) George Bush / Barack Obama safe, clean
nuclear:
http://tinyurl.com/bxrytup
http://tinyurl.com/aabxdmp
http://tinyurl.com/b94p6kg
http://tinyurl.com/b3weou9
Media journalist Karl Grossman’s audio clip of how the government and nuke
industry have managed both nuclear history and Fukushima (largely with silence)
and have manipulated public opinion since the first Trinity tests of the first
atomic bomb. Grossman is a veteran journalist who probably knows more about the
nuclear bomb and 4.6 billion year HAZMAT waste industry than anyone.
The government and media do not talk or write about
Cesium-137 and Strontium-90 fallout from Fukushima. We were and still are lied
to about every aspect of nuclear energy,
weapons, hazardous wastes and mismanagement of all things nuclear. Clean, cheap
and green nuclear are lies meant to fool all but those most well read on the poisoning of posterity.
The Karl Grossman (award winning anti-nuke journalist) radio
interview in the links above tells us from before the first atom bomb (Trinity)
to Fukushima, we have been lied to my the news media. This Intel Hub article tell us the
Japanese government is allowing radioactive HAZMAT to be dumped in rivers.
Domestically, American reactors 40+ years old are having the heat turned up to
make more steam in weakened, aging tanks and pipes – a risk taken purely for
greed.
There are cancer clusters around all of America’s reactors.
Any US
cancer cluster map and any nuclear
power plant map overlay each other nearly perfectly – with the nuke plant
close to center of cancer clusters. Map of Chernobyl Radioactive Fallout.
Japan built 50 nuke reactors on seismically active volcanic islands; much of
the USA did the same. In Grossman’s words, this is the most dangerous method
conceivable for boiling water. GE, Westinghouse, Toshiba and Hitachi wish to
expand their news media empire and their nuke power plant empire. Anyone who
knows all the facts would oppose nuclear expansion; but the nuke expanders own
the news, so few know the facts.
Michel Chossudovsky wrote, “Fukushima,
A Nuclear War without a War”. Enenews.com reports, “Over 200,000 Bq/kg of radioactive cesium in dust from outside Fukushima
Prefecture”. For the visually oriented, the NaturalNews
map
of Pacific Ocean Radiation is more newsworthy than 24-hour news cycles that
relegate 30-plus-years half-lives of Cesium and Strontium to “old news”. It is
only “old news” to those not eating radioactive tuna or breathing in
5-micron-sized pieces of Cesium dust in Hawaii, Japan, Alaska or Washington
State. The public perception of Fukushima old news is in reality one-million
new cancer deaths, probably more like 4-5 million new cancer deaths from 2012
through 2052 – over and above “normal” mortality. Governments have become
skilled at hiding such truths. If one includes Pacific Ocean dietary foods and
irradiated crops into the equation, the said numbers are probably extremely
conservative.
The nuke-owned-news will call it “lifestyle
cancer”; but the deaths are GE, Westinghouse, Toshiba and Hitachi “nuclear”
style deaths.
Here is what the US news is not telling you about Fukushima Number 4 and Plumegate (the cover up
of the triple nuclear meltdowns and possibly pending release/meltdown of
Reactor 3 MOX and possibly pending release/meltdown of Reactor 4 spent fuel.
Arnie Gundersen was quoted in articles, inferring possibly 2.89
billion (estimated) people could be at risk. The nuke/news-owner public
relations crowd went to work libeling Gundersen. The John F. Kennedy/Barrack Obama
Plumegate speech sums up the government’s abuse of America’s people
extremely well. The nuke-owned 24-hour news cycle makes death safe and worry
free. Was Gundersen’s 2.89
billion (estimated) humans at nuclear risk via Fukushima a typo, misquote,
hoax or possibly Gunderson thinking out loud and quoted online? The truth is that over hundreds of years, billions will die from Fukushima and Chernobyl Cancers.
We actually have both enough nuke bombs and nuke
water-boiling electricity generation plants to wipe all human life off of the
planet. Fukushima and Chernobyl are referred to as disasters, accidents and
unusual events. Plumegate, the cover-up of the 2.89
billion (estimated) humans threatened was ridiculed, with blog editors
either paid or threatened into silent compliance. The number of cancer deaths, globally, is incalculable.
If the quote is truly attributable to Gundersen, it is
closer to the truth than Obama’s notorious Plumegate speech: psychopaths put
radioactivity atop fault lines, behind tidal flood walls in Tsunami areas,
adjacent to volcanoes and in the path of hurricanes in the USA and all over
volcanic, overpopulated Japan.
Book-burning Propagandist Joseph Goebbels would have been
proud of the amelioration of common sense and knowledge, of the danger of
highly destructive, rapidly-breaking down isotopes; aka so-called “clean,
green, safe” Cesium-137 and Strontium-90. The nuclear isotopes most likely to
kill 2.89
billion (estimated) humans are now mislabeled “cheap electricity” and
“clean nuclear”.
Reich
propaganda minister Goebbels would have laughed out loud at Plutonium
MOX fuel verbally/textually referred to as next generation clean nuclear.
Clean, green, safe MOX Plutonium. The American public 2011-2013 are the human
guinea pigs of Japan and America’s latest Tsar Bomba.
Some do not see the similarity between the entities above (and
the US Pentagon) burning down web pages and alt-news blogs and Goebbels burning
books.
Obama promised the most transparent administration in US history, aka Plumegate. Just
remember Obama and Plumegate the
next time Obama Democrats or Ann Coulter Republicans call and ask for money.
The scariest thing about Plumegate is how censored it is in
all forms of media; one could easily think Plumegate
does not exist.
tags: nuclear nuke
fukushima plumegate waste radioactive obama clean news radiation coulter
uranium billion industry fuel government cesium cancer japan media
plants safe power american reactor casks spent strontium deaths
estimated america’s reactors green public obama’s energy barack clean
first caldicott tepco general electric