Deplatform the Platform: Why Google, Facebook and YouTube Should Bleed for Censorship

Chris Spencer
Deplatform the Platform: Why Google, Facebook and YouTube Should Bleed for Censorship
When your GMail, Music Video Site, Social Media Hearts and 401K Stocks are All Soaked in Gaza Blood, What Will It Take to Make You Quit?
Unfiltered, Unsurveilled Search Hub

In the ominous shadow cast by Gaza’s pulverized streets and the stifling digital silence engineered online, three corporate leviathans-Google, META (Facebook) and YouTube-have arrogated unto themselves the role of gatekeepers to genocide, deploying opaque algorithms as instruments of erasure and obfuscation. Their censorship is neither dispassionate moderation nor benign governance but rather a racist, systemic apparatus that actively perpetuates the obliteration of Palestinian voices and narratives. As these monopolistic platforms constrict discourse and amplify mendacity, their shareholders accrue profits forged in the crucible of complicity and silence.

The benefit of replacing Google is uncensored content..

The era of supplication to the censors is irrevocably over. We must forcibly deplatform the platform. By withdrawing our attention, clicks, and data, we strike at the sinews of their dominion: their hegemonic market capital. In this confrontation, our mass exodus functions not merely as defiance but as an economic coup de grâce. This exposé elucidates how Google and YouTube’s censorship machinery not only abets genocide but imperils their own institutional survival, while simultaneously charting a praxis toward emancipation-migration to genuinely free-speech bastions where truth is neither anathema nor inconvenience, but an insurrectionary weapon.*

The Corporate Architecture of Digital Erasure

At the nexus of algorithmic authoritarianism and capitalist hegemony, Google and YouTube operate less as neutral conduits of information than as ideological gatekeepers-sanctioning narratives consonant with state power while excising dissident voices. This is not happenstance but a meticulously engineered digital apartheid, wherein Palestinian content is systematically suppressed through shadowbanning, demonetization, and outright deletion. Reports from Human Rights Watch, 7amleh, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation converge on one grim conclusion: these platforms serve as complicit enablers of a genocidal campaign by silencing documentation, testimony, and resistance.

This orchestrated censorship exacerbates the informational asymmetry that fuels war crimes, permitting the proliferation of Israeli propaganda under the guise of “disinformation control.” The European Union’s recent warnings to Google and YouTube about “Hamas-Israel disinformation” underscore the geopolitical stakes of this content control - but the reality is more pernicious. The platforms’ algorithmic gatekeeping erects a cultural chokehold on Palestinian digital expression, rendering entire communities voiceless in the most consequential conflict of our era.

Exodus as Resistance: The Imperative to Abandon Racist Platforms

To remain tethered to Google, YouTube, and Facebook-platforms that weaponize censorship as a tool of ethnic erasure-is to tacitly endorse their racist complicity in Gaza’s ongoing genocide. These monopolies do not merely moderate content; they perpetuate digital hegemony that buttresses state violence, institutionalizing silence where there must be outrage. The shareholder value that fuels their expansion is inextricably entwined with this suppression, creating a toxic feedback loop where profits are paid for with Palestinian lives and voices.

The antidote is a massive digital divestment-an exodus away from the proprietary, algorithmically-rigged silos of the internet’s most powerful gatekeepers. Platforms such as Rumble, Odysee, BitChute, PeerTube, and Brighteon offer alternative ecosystems, championing free speech and hosting content that Google and YouTube systematically erase. Unlike their corporate counterparts, these platforms resist the Orwellian impulse to surveil and suppress, empowering creators and communities to reclaim digital agency.

A concise primer:

This digital defection is not merely a technical shift but a political act-an assertion that markets must answer to morals, and that the power of the few must be countered by the collective will to reclaim speech and resist genocide-enabling censorship.

Market Reckoning: When Censorship Becomes a Capital Crime

The invisible hand of the market rarely slumbers. Google and YouTube’s relentless censorship of Palestinian voices and complicity in genocidal narratives is not only a moral abomination - it is a ticking financial time bomb. Institutional investors, increasingly conscious of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) criteria and the growing chorus of public dissent, are beginning to perceive the platforms’ censorship policies as systemic liabilities.

Wall Street’s myopic focus on quarterly earnings has long overshadowed ethical imperatives, but the landscape is shifting. Reputational damage metastasizes into tangible financial risk. Activist shareholders and socially responsible funds are now weaponizing divestment campaigns, recognizing that the suppression of marginalized voices fuels widespread backlash - manifest in user flight, regulatory scrutiny, and, crucially, declining stock valuations.

Google’s parent company, Alphabet, and YouTube are ensnared in a paradox: their dominant market share is fueled by ad revenues that depend on user engagement, yet their draconian censorship alienates vast swaths of users who seek authentic discourse unshackled from political puppeteering. As public trust erodes, advertisers increasingly reevaluate the cost-benefit calculus of funneling capital into platforms accused of enabling genocide through digital silence.

The blacklisting of pro-Palestinian content, demonetization of dissenting channels, and opaque moderation policies constitute a market poison pill - one that invites both regulatory penalties and consumer rebellion. This is a rare moment when ethical imperatives align with investor interests: punishing censorship by starving the platforms of users and ad dollars can precipitate a market correction.

In this crucible, user migration to free speech alternatives becomes not just a form of protest but an economic lever that forces Google and YouTube to internalize the cost of their complicity. As these platforms hemorrhage users and advertising revenue, their stock prices will reflect the growing risk of continued censorship-fueled controversies.

The lesson is clear: to deplatform the platform is to transform political resistance into market accountability - making Google and YouTube financially accountable for their role in sustaining Gaza’s genocide through systemic, racist content suppression.

Digital Liberation: Your Tactical Guide to Free Speech Platforms

Escape the labyrinth of censorship. The path to digital emancipation lies through platforms that prize authenticity over algorithmic oppression, and free expression over ideological gatekeeping. Here’s a curated arsenal of alternatives-video and social content networks where your voice is sovereign, not shackled.

1. Rumble

A burgeoning colossus in the free speech arena, Rumble has attracted millions seeking refuge from YouTube’s opaque and politicized moderation. It boasts robust video hosting, monetization for creators, and a relatively transparent content policy. Unlike YouTube’s algorithmic throttling, Rumble’s community-driven approach amplifies uncensored discourse.

Pro tip: Set up your channel by linking a verified email and engaging consistently. Rumble offers monetization pathways that don’t require pandering to corporate censorship, making it ideal for activists and independent journalists alike.

2. Odysee

Built on the decentralized LBRY blockchain protocol, Odysee resists centralized control by design. Its peer-to-peer infrastructure thwarts takedowns and censorship, enabling users to publish videos, podcasts, and documents freely. Odysee’s monetization model uses cryptocurrency, circumventing ad-driven censorship pressures.

Pro tip: Download the LBRY app for seamless uploading and explore the “channels” feature to connect with like-minded creators. Odysee’s blockchain backbone guarantees your content’s resilience against authoritarian erasure.

3. BitChute

A long-standing bastion of anti-censorship video hosting, BitChute operates with minimal interference, championing free speech absolutism. While less polished than corporate rivals, its unfiltered environment attracts voices silenced elsewhere.

Pro tip: Use BitChute to archive your videos, share politically charged material, or amplify banned content. It’s a raw, grassroots alternative that privileges liberty over algorithmic convenience.

4. PeerTube

An open-source federated video platform, PeerTube disperses hosting across a network of independent servers, eliminating single points of censorship failure. Its community-driven ethos means moderation is localized, not imposed by an inscrutable corporate giant.

Pro tip: Pick a PeerTube instance that aligns with your values, create an account, and start posting. The decentralized nature protects your content from mass takedowns - a key bulwark for dissident speech.

5. Brighteon & D.Tube

Brighteon prides itself on zero censorship, attracting users banned from mainstream platforms. Similarly, D.Tube runs on blockchain tech like Odysee, combining decentralized hosting with a crypto economy to shield content from suppression.

Pro tip: Use these platforms to diversify your digital presence - cross-post videos, livestream, and build community without fear of algorithmic invisibility or takedown.

Why Migrate?
Moving your digital footprint away from Google, YouTube, and Facebook isn’t just a gesture of resistance - it’s an economic strike against corporations that profit from censorship and genocide complicity. Every user who defects chips away at their advertising revenue and investor confidence. Every new subscriber on Rumble or Odysee strengthens an ecosystem of free speech and uncompromised truth.

The battle for Gaza’s narrative is not fought solely in geopolitics but on these very platforms. Choose your digital weapons wisely, and let your migration be both an act of conscience and market justice.

6. The Broader Struggle: Beyond Platform Migration

The battleground of digital censorship is but one front in a sprawling war - a war that transcends algorithms and platforms, reaching deep into the sinews of global media monopolies, surveillance capitalism, and geopolitical war profiteering. The oligarchic gatekeepers of information are not merely silencing voices; they are architects of a techno-authoritarianism that serves imperial ambitions and entrenched hegemonies. The suppression of Palestinian narratives, enshrined in the code of Silicon Valley’s titans, echoes the logic of empire-where the erasure of inconvenient truths is a strategic imperative.

This is not a matter of neutral content moderation but an insidious form of digital colonialism, where censorship operates as a tool of state-sponsored violence, cloaked in the language of “community standards” and “hate speech policies.” As Tracy Turner and Chris Hedges have articulated, the silence imposed on oppressed peoples is a weapon wielded to manufacture consent for genocide. Matt Taibbi’s trenchant critiques of corporate complicity further illuminate how capitalism’s insatiable appetite colludes with authoritarian regimes to crush dissent.

In this crucible, resistance demands more than platform migration; it demands a seismic restructuring of information ecosystems and power relations. It demands international solidarity movements that fuse human rights advocacy with digital liberation, that recognize free speech as a fundamental bulwark against tyranny. It demands the courage to confront the interlocking systems of oppression-corporate, political, and technological-that conspire to suffocate Palestinian voices and, by extension, any voice that threatens the status quo.


7. The Power of Choice, The Power of Voice

The imperative is clear: to remain tethered to Google, YouTube, and Facebook is to be complicit in a censorship regime that fuels genocide. To deplatform the platform is to wield the power of economic and cultural defiance, a refusal to bankroll racism and repression cloaked in digital convenience.

This is not mere consumer choice; it is an act of resistance-a declaration that free speech cannot be extorted by monopolies that thrive on silencing dissent. The voices of Gaza, muffled but unyielding, beckon us to break these chains. The future belongs to those who refuse to be silenced, who wield their voices as weapons, who invest their attention, creativity, and capital in platforms that honor humanity, not genocide.

As Orwell warned, “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” The time has come to leave behind the racist platforms that foment Gaza’s obliteration through censorship and to build a new digital commons - one where justice, truth, and free speech reign supreme.

Ocho - Epilogue: The Moral and Economic Reckoning

Google, Facebook, and YouTube have unequivocally chosen death: not just the physical genocide of tens of thousands of Palestinians, but the intellectual genocide of free thought, transparency, and dissent. These platforms are no longer mere tech giants; they are death cults, engines of propaganda, indoctrination, and digital erasure. Yet, perversely, they demand your financial loyalty, your shares, your investment-your complicity in their war crimes and their market domination.

To buy stock in these corporate behemoths is to fund the annihilation of 60,000 to 70,000 dead and starving Palestinians, to profit from their silencing and suffering. This is a moral abyss. Resistance demands we click elsewhere, we spread the truth with viral defiance, and most decisively, we crush their stock prices. Economic sabotage is the frontline of digital insurgency-a weapon to wield with relentless fury.

The message is clear: no more profits for genocide, no more dividends for censorship. The time has come to starve these death cults of capital and reclaim the future of free speech from their charnel house of lies. Let this be the clarion call that dismantles the foundations of corporate tyranny and births a new era of genuine free expression.

Google, Facebook (Meta) and Youtube are the Alzheimer’s Disease (Apartheid Disease) of 1’s and 0’s. What they seek is not merely capitalistic ‘more money’. They wish to monopolize you (your logged keystrokes and clicks), entropy your brain (blot out their racist genocide from your eyes and brain) and have you loyally support their dachas and 300-foot yachts. Sell your stocks (which are going to lose value, they are blood-stocks) and don’t click on any of their pages or links. 

Deplatform the Platform: Why Google, Facebook and YouTube Should Bleed for Censorship

© 2025 Chris Spencer