Operation CHAOS, COINTELPRO, and the FBI/CIA's War on the Counterculture: Mae Brussell's Revelations of State-Sponsored Repression
Operation CHAOS, COINTELPRO, and the FBI/CIA's War on the Counterculture: Mae Brussell's Revelations of State-Sponsored Repression
U.S. Intelligence Agencies, engrossed in mass surveillance and the torture of innocent citizens through tactics like Surveillance Role Players, have become instruments of a corrupt empire, persecuting the innocent while allowing real terrorists-both foreign and domestic-to thrive unchecked. Obsessed with power and control, the system exacerbates the very terrorism it claims to combat, with counter-intelligence and counter-terrorism operations frequently undermining their own stated objectives.
The US government concocted several clandestine programs during the era of the 1960s and 1970s in a futile attempt to discourage the emergence of various counterculture groups opposed to authority and the promotion of controlled cultural movements. Of many such projects that garnered notoriety, perhaps the most intriguing was originally dubbed Operation CHAOS. Mae Brussell, a famous conspiracy researcher, devoted much of her work to researching how the CIA surveilled the counterculture. Her ideas, regularly read as briefs by members of both Houses of Congress, were well-embedded in various corroborated investigations and declassified documents showing the extent of the government's involvement in suppressing such movements. One of Mae Brussel's articles on Operation Chaos has a mortality list that would be suitable to a large airliner crash, but it is about probable assassinations via the CIA, FBI, NSA and the Military.
Mae Brussell's claim is that there was some inconsistency in the supposed death of Jimi Hendrix, including that his finding in the autopsy showed less than a lethal amount of barbiturates for a supposed overdose but his lungs did not reveal aspiration pneumonia, which was supposed to be the companion cause. Brussell also pointed out that the circumstances of finding Hendrix's body were suspicious: nobody had seen him fall, and in general, the conditions of how he was found were strange. The anomaly of these aspects was, according to her, supposed to indicate that his death might have been orchestrated, not just an overdose. Jimi had a very low blood alcohol level, contrary to claims he was heavily intoxicated. His lungs (not his stomach) were filled with more than a liter of Red Wine.
Jimi Hendrix reportedly offered to fly Black activists to Washington, D.C., in 1969 to support their political efforts, highlighting his growing political awareness and solidarity with the Civil Rights Movement. This gesture was seen by some as a sign of his potential influence, which Mae Brussell speculated could have made him a target of powerful interests. Hendrix made the offer and was then found dead. We are to believe he made the promise and then committed suicide. Mae Brussell argued that Hendrix's political engagement with Black activists made him a target of powerful interests. Despite being fond of psychedelics, Hendrix allegedly "committed suicide" after promising to fly Black Panthers to Washington, D.C. He had over a liter of Red Wine (not vomit) in his *LUNGS*. The only person who knew what might have happened, his girlfriend Monika Charlotte Dannemann fell down a dark stairwell. Both deaths were and are extremely suspicious. The Mae Brussell article discussing these events is here. Monika Charlotte Dannemann told authorities Jimi Hendrix had been murdered, then recanted, then fell down a stairwell.
The Church Committee and Government Surveillance
The Church Committee, officially known as the Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations concerning Intelligence Activities, was a significant investigation into US intelligence activities. Established in 1975, this committee exposed numerous covert operations run by the CIA, FBI, and other intelligence agencies. Most notably, it documented that among the targets of Operation CHAOS were anti-Vietnam War activists, student organizations, and other segments of the US’S counterculture. The committee vindicated her on the point that the government had indeed undertaken an extensive spy network through the CIA, neutralizing perceived threats to the political and social order of the US.
McCoy’s Analysis and Contextualizing CIA Methods
A wider context of the CIA's secret operations during the Vietnam War is provided by Alfred W. McCoy's book The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia, published in 1972. Although McCoy focuses on the CIA's devolution in the international narcotics trade, he provides sufficient evidence of the CIA's secret operations. McCoy's work illuminates the methods utilized by intelligence agencies in controlling domestic dissent, showing how the CIA employed manipulative tactics to influence public opinion and suppress political movements. His analysis further confirms Brussell's thesis: that the government sought hegemony over the political and cultural landscape, which the burgeoning counterculture rejected. McCoy’s past work (by extrapolation) shows the government running an extremely lucrative "business" to pump money into Black Operations . The Programs in the preceding link are too fat to fit in this slim article. Today’s The Program (1990-2025) snips bitcoin, stock trades, engages in human trafficking to monetize NSA black ops (paying Surveillance Role Players). The endless march of Black Operations has been and is an existential threat, it sidetracks truly pressing existential threats .
Marchetti and Marks on CIA Infiltration
One of the central sources vindicating all of Brussell's findings is the book by Victor Marchetti and John D. Marks, CIA and the Cult of Intelligence , published in 1974. This exposé, written by ex-CIA officer Marchetti and journalist Marks, delves into the agency's covert operations. The book highlights how the CIA actively infiltrated and disrupted domestic groups, including anti-war protests and radical leftist movements, with the intent to disrupt them. It also mentions the agency's domestic surveillance, supporting Brussell's claims of the CIA's in-depth involvement in monitoring and subverting cultural movements, especially the Global counterculture.
COINTELPRO and FBI Repression
In addition to the CIA, the FBI played a leading role in repressing domestic dissent through programs such as COINTELPRO (Counterintelligence Program). Nelson Blackstock's 1973 article Fearing the Black Messiah: The FBI and the Counterculture speaks to how the FBI attempted to penetrate and neutralize civil rights and left-wing counterculture. Although COINTELPRO primarily targeted racial and political activism, it extended to the counterculture, perceiving these movements as threats to national security. Blackstock's article highlights governmental surveillance and disruption patterns that align with Brussell's theories regarding targeting cultural figures deemed subversive to the established political order. It is ironic that the CIA promoted LSD, and then the FBI went to war with the Psychedelic movement.
Surveillance and Harassment of Activists, Musicians, Politicians, and Leaders (1960s-2020s) Name (Years Surveilled) Role/Title/Occupation Agency/Agencies that Harassed/Surveilled Reason for Surveillance/Harassment Martin Luther King Jr. (1960s) Civil Rights Leader, Baptist Minister FBI (COINTELPRO) Advocacy for racial equality, anti-war activism, influence on the Civil Rights Movement Malcolm X (1960s-1965) Black Nationalist, Minister, Civil Rights Leader FBI, CIA Leadership in the Nation of Islam, outspoken criticism of U.S. government policies, anti-imperialist views John Lennon (1970s) Musician, Former Member of The Beatles, Peace Activist FBI, CIA, NSA (Operation CHAOS) Anti-Vietnam War activism, involvement in peace movements that were seen as subversive Bob Dylan (1960s-1970s) Singer-Songwriter, Protest Music Icon FBI, CIA (Operation CHAOS) Influential political songs, civil rights activism, anti-war stance Jane Fonda (1970s) Actress, Anti-Vietnam War Activist FBI Anti-Vietnam War protests, especially her trip to North Vietnam in 1972 Angela Davis (1960s-2020s) Political Activist, Scholar FBI (COINTELPRO) Involvement with the Black Panther Party, Communist Party, radical Black Power movement The Black Panther Party (BPP) (1960s-1970s) Revolutionary Socialist Organization FBI (COINTELPRO) Advocacy for Black self-defense, empowerment, anti-police actions Huey Newton (1960s-1970s) Co-Founder of the Black Panther Party FBI (COINTELPRO) Leadership in the BPP, advocacy for armed self-defense of Black communities Bobby Seale (1960s-1970s) Co-Founder of the Black Panther Party FBI (COINTELPRO) Leadership in the BPP, involvement in protests, anti-government rhetoric Fred Hampton (1969) Chairman of Illinois Chapter of the Black Panther Party FBI, Chicago Police (COINTELPRO) Radical Black Power leadership, organizing, assassination by FBI Cesar Chavez (1960s-1970s) Labor Leader, Civil Rights Activist FBI Advocacy for farm workers' rights, labor organizing, support for nonviolent resistance Leonard Peltier (1970s-present) Native American Activist and AIM Member FBI Involvement in the American Indian Movement (AIM), conviction for murder of two FBI agents Tommy Smothers (1960s-1970s) Comedian, TV Host (The Smothers Brothers) FBI Political satire, anti-Vietnam War comments on his television show Abbie Hoffman (1960s-1970s) Political Activist, Co-Founder of the Yippies FBI, CIA Radical political activities, anti-Vietnam War protests, disruption of the political process Jerry Rubin (1960s-1970s) Political Activist, Co-Founder of the Yippies FBI Radical protests, Chicago Eight trial, anti-government activism Sonia Sanchez (1960s-1970s) Poet, Civil Rights Activist FBI Black Arts Movement, Black Power activism Chicano and Native American Activists (1960s-1970s) Leaders and Activists of Chicano and Native American Rights Movements FBI (COINTELPRO) Advocacy for Indigenous and minority rights, anti-colonialism, self-determination The American Indian Movement (AIM) (1960s-1970s) Civil Rights and Native American Advocacy Organization FBI (COINTELPRO) Protests for Native American rights, including the 1973 Wounded Knee Occupation Woody Guthrie (1930s-1950s) Folk Singer, Political Activist FBI Advocacy of labor rights, anti-fascist views, socialist beliefs during the Great Depression Phil Ochs (1960s-1970s) Singer-Songwriter, Political Activist FBI Anti-Vietnam War protest songs, outspoken political activism Jackson Browne (1970s-1980s) Singer-Songwriter FBI Involvement in peace activism, left-leaning political causes Peter, Paul, and Mary (1960s-1970s) Folk Music Trio FBI Anti-Vietnam War activism, civil rights support through their music Diana Ross and the Supremes (1960s-1970s) Motown Group FBI Political activism, influence on African American population, effect on Civil Rights era Edward Snowden (2013-2020s) Former NSA Contractor, Whistleblower CIA, FBI, NSA Revealing global surveillance programs, exposing government overreach and privacy violations Assata Shakur (1970s-present) Political Activist, Former Black Panther FBI Alleged involvement in 1973 police officer's murder, political activism, living in exile in Cuba Julian Assange (2010s-2020s) Wikileaks Founder CIA, FBI, UK Intelligence Publishing classified government materials, exposing U.S. military actions, facing extradition to the U.S. for espionage charges Documented Evidence and National Archives Findings
The declassification of many government documents over the decades has further validated Brussell's research. Documents obtained from the National Archives reveal the CIA's surveillance activities targeting cultural figures and political activists. For example, the CIA monitored anti-Vietnam War protests, civil rights leaders, and countercultural icons, including many, many rock stars. These findings confirm Brussell's assertion that the government viewed the counterculture as a threat and employed dark operations to suppress it.
The Program: Evolution and Continued Surveillance
In the 1990s and 2000s, such operations re-emerged under the rubric of The Program, expanding on Operation CHAOS with more advanced technological methods. This paper examines how The Program evolved from Operation CHAOS and its continued impact on surveillance, dissent, and political activism.
The term The Program entered usage after the 1993 Rwandan genocide, the Gulf War, and the emergence of the civil rights and environmental movements. Because the true origins of The Program were and remain murky, it was assumed to have been an outgrowth of earlier projects like CHAOS and COINTELPRO, combining both domestic and foreign wiretaps into a single larger program. However, what was different with the Program was that the more pervasive use of emerging technologies, such as observation, data mining, and surreptitious information gathering from social media sites during the earlier years of Operation CHAOS, had not been as readily available.
Another seminal contributor to the issue is Mark Lowenthal, whose work Intelligence: From Secrets to Policy (2003) traced the operations of intelligence agencies in regard to political movements in the United States during the latter half of the 20th century. Lowenthal recorded how the CIA was part of active movements through an assumed premise of counterterrorism and ensuring national security. He discussed the increasing role of information technology and how it expanded the scope of surveillance efforts well beyond what had been conceived during the era of Operation CHAOS. Lowenthal's work suggests that while The Program was not an explicit continuation of CHAOS, its methods and goals shared many of the same objectives: preventing the rise of political movements that challenged the American status quo (Lowenthal, 2003).
The Expanding Surveillance State: Technology and The Program
The most basic function in which The Program differentiated from its precursor, Operation CHAOS, rested in the monumental technological scaling up of surveillance. During the 1960s and 1970s, the CIA utilized HUMINT surveillance, such as infiltration of protest groups, wiretapping phone lines, and intercepting communications. However, as the digital age advanced, central intelligence agencies began to rely increasingly on signals intelligence and the newly developing open-source intelligence methods whereby they could track people and groups through computers, phones, and eventually the Internet. The Patriot Act of 2001, following the September 11 attack, empowered a broader scope for a systematic surveillance program, directly feeding into The Program. Daniel Ellsberg, the former military analyst who disclosed the so-called Pentagon Papers in 1971, called the new legal framework since 9/11 a path through which state surveillance operations began to stretch into areas that were once considered unconstitutional or too intrusive. According to Ellsberg (2004), this associated surveillance state reached unprecedented levels in the 21st century, making it much harder for such voices of dissent to fail to be picked up by the ever-vigilant intelligence agencies.
Perhaps most significantly, insight into that shift came through the work of Glenn Greenwald on the Edward Snowden revelations in 2013. No Place to Hide, as Greenwald's book of 2014 explained, was for example the extent of mass surveillance of virtually any digital communication: from emails through social network messages. It was justified as counterterrorism at the time but certainly raises some pretty fundamental questions with regard to the continued suppression of dissent, as movements pertaining to civil rights, labor organizing, and anti-globalization become increasingly put under surveillance. Greenwald's research underlines the evolution that US intelligence operations have undergone under The Program and suggests that, in the post-9/11 world, many of the same tactics used in CHAOS had been modernized and made more invasive.
The Program and Contemporary Movements
Well into the early 21st century, The Program continued to have an oversized effect on several social and political movements, most notably the anti-globalization protests in the late 1990s and early 2000s. As movements against global economic structures and corporate control, the United States viewed these actions as threats to national and international stability. Agencies like the CIA and FBI continued their attempts at infiltrating, monitoring, and disrupting protest groups through various means, ranging from traditional infiltration and surveillance to the more covert tactics of cyber surveillance.
Besides the targeting of distinct political movements, The Program expanded to monitor public figures in the entertainment industry, particularly those opposing US foreign policy. Public figures included Michael Moore, Sean Penn, and Tim Robbins, all vocal critics of the Iraq War who reportedly had been under surveillance in the broader efforts to quell anti-war dissent (Madsen, 2004). This has been a continuous act on the part of the government in monitoring not only political movements but also those who may sway public opinion and the masses against them.
Less publicized than, and much less studied than, its forerunners, Operation CHAOS and COINTELPRO, The Program represents a turning point in the history of the US government's strategy of domestic repression. Ongoing development within the technologies of surveillance, combined with new legal frameworks and growing fears concerning national security created an environment in which a much larger and more intrusive politics-monitoring Program could be built. While some of the means utilized in The Program were quite reasonably shown to be part of counterterrorism, they inevitably raised serious questions regarding civil liberties and the erosion of privacy. From Operation CHAOS to The Program, that historical arc reveals a pattern reminiscent of how the government has sought to retain control over political narratives and suppress opposition as methods and technologies evolve.
Widening the Investigation into Covert Activities against the Counterculture
While most publicity has concerned the government's secret operations during the 1960s and 1970s-Operation CHAOS being the best known-the better-documented aspects of the US surveillance and suppression effort, further scholarship adds an important dimension to our consideration of the era. This expanded question now encompasses the military's role, media complicity, the part played by cultural icons, modern parallels in contemporary surveillance, and were drug control interfaces with countercultural surveillance. These help us see the multiagency efforts taken to control dissent and maintain the political order of the time. The Role of the US Military in Domestic Surveillance
Besides the CIA and FBI, the US army was responsible for most of the domestic surveillance through military intelligence and the NSA. The government had used military intelligence in the post-Vietnam War era to spy on domestic anti-war movements. Operations positioned the NSA to intercept communications between US dissident groups and foreign organizations as part of a more efficient intelligence machinery aimed at suppressing political as well as cultural movements. Such military involvement put a finger on the pulse of the state apparatus brought down against those challenging the US political status quo during the 1960s and 1970s.
Documentary Films and Oral Histories
Documentaries and oral histories fill in some gaps in knowledge about the experiences of those targeted or active in covert operations. Films like The Spook Who Sat by the Door (1973) dramatize the reach of the operations into dissent, while the documentary The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence (2003) is a direct look at intelligence operations, including CHAOS. Oral histories by retired CIA officers, like John Stockwell, speaking in the first person about illegal activities of the agency, provide texture to understanding the surveillance and political control of the time.
Role of US Media US media actively supported or passively propagated the narratives inspired by the government. Many mainstream outlets helped the government frame civil rights activists, feminists, and anti-Vietnam War protestors as subversive threats to national security. Such research in this area may show that complicity within the media created public perceptions about the counterculture and the government's surveillance efforts in service of intelligence agencies' agendas such as the CIA and FBI.
Cultural Icons and Their Influence
The neutralization of John Lennon, Bob Dylan, and Abbie Hoffman had been only part of the broader effort of the government in repressing anti-government views. This surveillance on Lennon by the FBI revealed, together with the opening of government records, how high-profile cultural icons posed a danger not solely from their political actions but through their cultural importance as well. Works like Nowhere Man: The Final Days of John Lennon by Robert Rosen therefore give reason to believe that a government fearful of its power to mobilize young people against the prevailing political order acted.
Historical Parallels with Modern Surveillance Modern practices of surveillance, especially in this post-War on Terror and post-Snowden era, have shown striking parallels with the tactics utilized in Operation CHAOS. The depth of the NSA domestic surveillance programs-from mass data collection-reflects the continuity and growth of state surveillance across time. Comparatively, the two periods make more sense with how government surveillance has evolved and how consistent the motives are behind such an activity: the control of dissent and maintenance of political stability. This parallel serves as a useful lens to consider the more enduring legacy of covert operations like CHAOS.
Other Targets
Of course, it wasn't only Lennon and Dylan who did not escape the prying eyes of government intelligence. Similar to most musicians known to have and express their political views, Frank Zappa also became a target in similar ways by the intelligence community. Active disinformation operations against Hollywood figures perceived as politically subversive did occur. Judging the less well-known targets of such operations places the government's organized endeavor to contain political activity and its cultural impact when it threatened entrenched values in a wider perspective.
The Drug War and COINTELPRO
The FBI's COINTELPRO operation, while primarily associated with civil rights and Black Power movements, also encompassed the counterculture, particularly in relation to the linkage between drug use and political radicalism. The government's obsession with the counterculture's drug use, particularly with its associations with marijuana and psychedelics, reveals the juncture at which social control and surveillance meet. How the FBI and other agencies linked drug use with political subversion provides further insight into the broader government strategy to neutralize countercultural movements.
Legislative Responses to Covert Operations
A spate of seminal legislative responses succeeded the revelations by the Church Committee. In fact, FISA and the Intelligence Oversight Act were all meant to contain excess in domestic surveillance. Indeed, reforms actually tried to make the operations less secret and more subjected to oversight, although a number of questions about these reforms' efficacy still remain. It is within an analysis of such legislative responses that understanding will emerge as to how the shift in government efforts towards suppression of dissent after public exposure of covert activities shifted and how the intelligence community adapted to maintain control within new legal constraints.
Media Complicity and Cultural Icons
The US media often supported government narratives, portraying civil rights activists and anti-war protestors as threats to national security. The surveillance and targeting of cultural icons like John Lennon and Frank Zappa highlighted efforts to neutralize figures seen as politically subversive.
From Operation CHAOS to The Program, the historical arc reveals the government's enduring strategy to control political narratives and suppress opposition. This legacy underscores ongoing concerns about privacy, state control, and the suppression of dissent.
Investigative Journalists and Whistleblowers
While exposés from the Church Committee as early as the 1970s had brought to light the then-surreptitious workings of the CIA, for the most part, The Program was still under wraps until the late 1990s. It was not until after a slew of whistleblowers, former intelligence officers, and investigative journalists released information about the operation that any actual existence or extent was truly understood.One of the largest exposés about The Program came through John Ranelagh's The Agency: The Rise and Decline of the CIA (2001), documenting the shifting nature of CIA operations and further surveillance on dissent using new guidelines. Ranelagh insinuated that the general principles of surveillance, political intervention, and neutralization of perceived threats to US interests continued for many years after the official termination of Operation CHAOS.
The True Nature of Covert Operations: Control, Not Protection
These covert operations, whether they are called CHAOS, COINTELPRO, MK Ultra, or The Program, are not simply about protecting national security. At their core, these programs serve to maintain a political system that thrives on secrecy, fear, and control. The real purpose of these agencies is not to prevent terrorism, but to perpetuate their own existence through the surveillance and suppression of dissent.
Counter-Intelligence: A Sinister Game of False Targets
The world of counterintelligence is a shadowy one, in which the lines between genuine national security concerns and the targeting of innocents are blurred. These agencies, often operating with a sense of paranoia and institutional inertia, have historically targeted vulnerable and marginalized groups-those most likely to challenge the status quo-while diverting attention away from actual threats. This is a fundamental flaw in the intelligence apparatus: a fixation on dissenters, rather than on real terrorism.
Scapegoats and Silenced Voices
Throughout history, political and social justice movements, including the civil rights movement, have been targeted not because they posed a real threat to national security, but because they represented a challenge to the established power structure. Figures like Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, Angela Davis, and Assata Shakur were surveilled and persecuted not for any violent intentions, but because their calls for justice and equality posed a threat to the status quo. Their resistance, not foreign power, was the real danger in the eyes of the state.
The Real Terrorists: Unseen and Unscathed
Meanwhile, the real terrorists-those responsible for violent acts or destabilizing regimes abroad-slipped through the cracks, often aided by the very intelligence systems that were meant to prevent such attacks. The CIA’s secret operations to overthrow foreign governments in countries like Iran, Chile, and Guatemala are a case in point. Yet, while the U.S. intelligence agencies focused on surveilling dissent at home, they failed to recognize and thwart the genuine threats emerging on the international stage.
The True Purpose: Power and Perpetuation
This dynamic is not a result of incompetence; it is intentional. Intelligence agencies exist in a cycle of self-preservation. The bigger the "threat," the greater the budget. The more "terrorists" that can be created out of activists, dissenters, or innocent bystanders, the more justification there is for the surveillance state’s existence. This system feeds itself, perpetuating fear and suspicion to maintain its own power and control.
A Never-Ending Cycle
The tragic irony is that those who challenge the system-whether through protest, intellectual debate, or artistic expression-are marked as the enemies of the state, while the true terrorists escape scrutiny. From COINTELPRO to today’s surveillance programs, the pattern remains consistent: the machinery of repression targets the powerless while protecting the powerful. In the end, the surveillance state does not work to protect the public; it works to protect itself, fostering fear and uncertainty to justify its ongoing existence.
The agencies responsible for surveillance have long pursued a policy of repression, turning the very tools meant to protect national security into mechanisms of political control. From MK Ultra to the modern-day surveillance dragnet, these operations have always been more about control than protection. They create a perpetual state of fear and uncertainty, with the agencies at the center of this cycle, unaccountable and unchecked. While the names and methods may change, the core mission of these programs remains the same: to maintain power, suppress dissent, and justify their own existence. And in the process, they turn us all into suspects, while the true dangers remain unchecked and unaddressed.
This study underscores how US intelligence agencies monitored and suppressed dissent during the 20th century and draws modern parallels with contemporary surveillance practices. This historical trajectory highlights enduring tensions between national security, privacy, and civil liberties. The Patriot Act, AUMF, NDAA 1021, and 1022 all grant the U.S. government broad surveillance and detention powers, raising concerns over civil rights, including privacy, due process, and protection from indefinite detention.
"FBI forced to admit Patriot Act powers led to exactly zero major terrorism cases cracked." Maggie Ybarra - Washington Times. - Thu, 21 May 2015Dedicated to Brett Redmayne Titley and Sky Ebbets.
"If there had ever been a Conspiracy Theory named Chaos or CoIntelPro, I would have certainly have heard of it, by now..." Rob Kall (telephonically in 2012) owner of OpEdNews, Censor Extraordinaire. Gedankenkontrolle, Rob. MK CHAOS is Germanic, for Mind Kontrolle CHAOS, Rob. Are you listening, or are you too busy curating disinformation?
The only thing MK CHAOS is an error, but an important one on my part.
It should read, "MH Chaos", not MK Chaos. There are so many it is confusing: MK Ultra, MK Ultra, MK-NAOMI, MK-SEARCH, MK Naomi, MK Delta are all interrelated to MH Chaos. MK Chickwit. MK Often, et al.
To this day, Operation Mockingbird (The Media) keeps it all hush-hush. Shh, don't use Yandex.com to look up, one-by-one:
Agent Blue, Agent Orange, AVIARY, Blue Beam, Blue Flag, Camelot, CHAOS, Cloverleaf, COINTELPRO, FUBELT, GRILL-FLAME, L.U.C.I.D., MK Chikwit, MK Delta, MK Often, MK Naomi, MK Search, MK Ultra, Mockingbird, Monarch, Paperclip, Phoenix Project, Project Pegasus, Operation Artichoke/Bluebird, Operation Chatter, OPERATION CONDOR, Operation Doormouse, Operation Jefferson, Operation Keelhaul, Operation Garden Potter, Operation MILABS, Operation Midnight Climax, Operation Mind Control, Operation Northwoods, Operation Pique, Operation Red Rock, Operation REX 84,
Catcher, Starfish, Tailwind Project, Control, Operation, Mind, Whale.To, Bibliotecapleyades.Net, Government, Corrupt, Blue, Monarch, Agent, Artichoke, Mk-Ultra, Condor, History, Secret, Montauk, Security, Chaos, Intelligence, Program, Mockingbird, Mkultra and Nazi-CIA Canadian Experiments with Mind Control on Children (Paperclip).References:
Blackstock, N. (1973). Fearing the Black Messiah: The FBI and the Counterculture. The Nation.
Brussell, M. (1970). The Death of Jimi Hendrix and Monika Dannemann: A Case for CHAOS [Article]. Mae Brussell Archives.
Church Committee. (1975). Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations concerning Intelligence Activities. US Senate.
Colodny, L. (2007). A Lie Too Big to Fail: The Real History of the CIA. Skyhorse Publishing.
Ellsberg, D. (2004). Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers. Viking.
Greenwald, G. (2014). No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the US Surveillance State. Metropolitan Books.
Jeffreys-Jones, R. (2007). The FBI and the American Political Tradition. Yale University Press.
Levine, Y. (2018). Surveillance Valley: The Secret Military History of the Internet. Hachette Books.
Lowenthal, M. (2003). Intelligence: From Secrets to Policy (3rd ed.). CQ Press.
Marchetti, V., & Marks, J. D. (1974). CIA and the Cult of Intelligence. Dell Publishing.
Madsen, W. (2004). Washington's New World Order: The Rise of the US Surveillance State. Global Research.
McCoy, A. W. (1972). The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia. Lawrence Hill Books.
National Archives. (n.d.). Declassified CIA Documents. US National Archives.
Ranelagh, J. (2001). The Agency: The Rise and Decline of the CIA. Simon & Schuster.
Sharlet, J. (2008). The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power. HarperOne.
Stockwell, J. (1990). In Search of Enemies: A CIA Story. W.W. Norton & Company.
Wilson, H. (Director). (1973). The Spook Who Sat by the Door [Film]. American International Pictures.
Wise, D., & Ross, T. B. (1999). The Company: A Documentary History of the CIA. The Free Press.
Shapira, I. (Director). (2002). The Weather Underground [Film]. First Run Features.
© www.olivebiodiesel.com. All rights reserved.
